On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 04:13:26PM +0000, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:46:20PM -0600, Elliot Shank wrote: > > > > Tim Bunce wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 04:48:35PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> For a particular program, report generation using nytprofhtml 2.05 took > > >> 3+ minutes. Using 2.07, report generation took 5 hours, 46 minutes. > > > > > > I've made some changes now. How does the current trunk (r590) compare > > > for that same program? > > > > The program has changed since, with, I'm guessing, 25% more code, but r590 > > nytprofhtml took 54 minutes on the current version. > > We're moving in the right direction then :-) > > How many source files, source lines, and subroutines are in the report? > > Try this to profile nytprofhtml itself: > > mv nytprof.out nytprof-orig.out > perl -d:NYTProf -S nytprofhtml --file=nytprof-orig.out > nytprofhtml > tar cfz nytprof-report.tar.gz nytprof > > and email the nytprof-report.tar.gz to me.
Preferably using r591 as that's improved the performance further. Thanks. Tim. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You've received this message because you are subscribed to the Devel::NYTProf Development User group. Group hosted at: http://groups.google.com/group/develnytprof-dev Project hosted at: http://perl-devel-nytprof.googlecode.com CPAN distribution: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-NYTProf To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
