Quoting Randy Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Tony, > > Thanks! I have a followup question below. > > On Wednesday 07 November 2007 07:43 am, Tony Balinski wrote: > > I use > > ctags -e -R --excmd=pattern --extra=fq --fields=afiKmsSz \ > > --C-kinds=+cdefgmnpstuvx --C++-kinds=+cdefgmnpstuvx \ > > -o TAGS > > which I think probably gives me just about everything. You do get > multiple > > entries for both definition and declaration, though, which may be > annoying. > > The emacs format (incompatible with vi) is less wasteful of diskspace. > > What version of ctags are you using? > > I'm using: > > ctags (GNU Emacs 21.3) > Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc. and Ken Arnold > > ... and I don't see all those options--just for starters, -e is flagged as > an invalid option.
Yup: pretty vital. I've been using Exuberant CTags for ages now: Exuberant Ctags 5.5, Copyright (C) 1996-2003 Darren Hiebert Compiled: Jun 5 2003, 10:00:19 Addresses: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://ctags.sourceforge.net Optional compiled features: +wildcards, +regex, +internal-sort It's easy to get, build, use etc. It also adds extra information to each entry that can be useful. Tony -- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
