On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Joerg Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bert Wesarg wrote: > > calltip(): > > * should return the calltipID, or zero on failure > Yes. > > > * should never popup a 'not-found'-calltip > Yes. > > > * should fail for more than one matching, ie no dialog > > Yes, where the matching depends on the smart or all behaviour, that > is, if the setting is smart, even if there are more than one matches > it may be possible to determine one, and then this one is shown. > That's the way it is now. What should change is the dialog thing > in case a single key can't be determined. In this case, no dialog, > return 0. This problem should also go away, if there is the tags/tips search macro, than a macro programmer can check how many tags/tips there are for a key, and than select a specific tag/tip to show/jump.
> > * a new mode for tips which don't fallback to tags > > Yes, the "tipKey" mode should be changed such that it doesn't fall > back to "tagKey". I think, if I want to show a tip and act according > to whether it is found or not, I don't want to find a tag, and if so I > can achieve this easily by repeating the lookup with "tagKey" in case > of a failure - that's what macro programming can do. There is no need > for the simple one size fits all approach provided by the action > routines. Ahh, thats also possible and feels as the right thing to do. > > > > Is this correct and are other developers with this? If, I have a look > > at this issue. > > Can't we have a maintenance release first;-) and thereafter a switch > from CVS to subversion? I know, coding surely is more fun, but IMO > the foundation for the changes to come is still missing somehow. Sure, I haven't planed to do it know. This can wait after the release, without question. Bert > > > > Jörg
-- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
