On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  * Bert Wesarg wrote (2008-03-09 23:07):
>
> >On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>  * Bert Wesarg wrote (2008-03-09 22:41):
>  >> >On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Randy Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >>  >>    4. What will you do to ensure that your accepted students stick 
> with the
>  >>  >>  project after GSoC concludes?
>  >>  >>
>  >>  >I think this is really simple, I mean NEdit is an editor, if you
>  >>  >program an editor, you should use it, and if you use it, you find bugs
>  >>  >or limitiations, and you will always program on the codebase, as long
>  >>  >as you use the edit, or?
>  >>
>  >>  So is using NEdit on NEdit a requirement?
>  >Hmm, would you code on an editor, if you don't use it?
>
>  Nope, it's silly, we still don't have to make it an requirement for SoC.
ok, than do this: s/should/probably/

Bert
>
>
>  Thorsten
>  --
>  Profanity is the inevitable linguistic crutch of the inarticulate 
> motherfucker.
>     - Bruce Sherrod
>
> --
>  NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected]
>  http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
>
>
-- 
NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected]
http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop

Reply via email to