On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 22:49 -0500, Aaron W. Hsu wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:27:44 +0100 > Joor Loohuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We're (finally) in the process of moving nedit.org to a new > > server. More on that in the near future. We noticed that the nedit > > project has CVS access to the source tree on SF, but no SVN > > access. This might be a FAQ, but is there a possibility that SVN > > access is added? It would make automatic management the website and > > ftp repo a lot easier. > > Just my own opinion, but if having SVN means losing CVS, I would > personally prefer to have CVS access rather than SVN, just from an > user standpoint.
I consider that a matter of personal preference. The main advantage of SVN is that we can treat a checked out repository as a local repository that we can manipulate to set up the website and other things. Just to clarify, I'm not requesting that we give up on CVS, because too many dependencies exist. If SVN and CVS are mutually exclusive on Sourceforge, then we will adjust our procedures so they work with CVS. -- Joor Loohuis, MSc Loco (Loohuis Consulting) http://www.loohuis-consulting.nl/ -- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
