On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Bert Wesarg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 01:11, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:09 AM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Bert Wesarg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:34, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I notice a BETA-5-6 branch in Berg Wesarg's repo created about a year >>>>> ago, but they seemed to be no plan to release it. Just wondering >>>>> what's the development/background on this. >>>> Joerg puts it in a nutshell. We need also to bring over fixes from >>>> MAIN to the BETA branch. I can handle this. The rest of the release >>>> procedure would be new new me. >>> >>> Is binary release being the issue here? If not, then it should be >>> limited to just updating the release note and make the annoucement >>> right? That said, I never done a release, so this also new (and old >>> ;-) today to me. >> >> I presume the mercrual repo will help ease the merging work of >> bringing the fixes from main to beta branch, even if it still have to >> ported back to CVS. > I would use the GIT repo for this ;-) the end result needs still to be
Good thing NEdit main source repo is still in CVS ;-) > applied to the CVS. So who will do it? > > I'm also in favour to only release the source, and add binaries as they show > up. +1 -- NEdit Develop mailing list - [email protected] http://www.nedit.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
