In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So it sounds like some people are saying that the emacs-bidi code > is usable as it stands and is worth installing, and nobody thinks > it is useless. Meanwhile, it looks like you are ready to make > use of Eli's code in the short term.
> If we can use Eli's code soon enough, then it's not worth installing > the Emacs-bidi code; it would just be extra work. On the other hand, > if it looks like the difficulty of using Eli's code is enough to make > it hard, then I think we should install the Emacs-bidi code now. Synchronizing emacs-unicode to HEAD will take a few weeks more. After that, I'll take a look at Eli's code and decide what to do. In any cases, I will install the changes for BIDI in the branch emacs-unicode-2 because the current codes of emacs-bidi depends on automatic-composition facitliy to display Arabic and Hebrew, and that exists only in emacs-unicode (and in emacs-bidi) version. I'd like to avoid the extra work of installing automatic-composition for the current HEAD. FYI, the automatic-composition is to call various character composition functions from the dipslay routine dynamically so that we don't have to run XXX-compose-region on file reading and character inputting. --- Ken'ichi HANDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
