--- Mohammed Elzubeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > from what I understand from PuTTY's authors (search the list > archives here for previous discussions and threads), they want > a BiDi implementation that is OS-agnostic. That essentially > means that whatever MS provides is a no-no. Else, it would > have been implemented a long time ago ;)
Really ? Could you please provide some URLs. I can't see why Putty would want to do that since it would increase the size of the currently tiny application for the relative benefit of a very small audience. I would think it would be more to Putty's benefit to rely on windows' native bidi calls - but then again, lots of things don't make sense :-) Salam. - Nadim __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
