--- Muhammad Alkarouri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 19:42, Nadim Shaikli wrote: > > --- Simon Tatham wrote: > > > > > > I'm unconvinced about this, I'm afraid. That promotion clause looks > > > horribly like a GPL incompatibility to me, and one reason I like the > > > MIT licence is that it's fully GPL-compatible. > > Short answer, no need. It _is_ GPL-compatible, as stated by the FSF > > I am not related to ICU/IBM/FSF/etc, but I would like to draw your > attention to the fact that this is exactly the X11 license explicitly > mentioned by FSF as GPL compatible under the name 'The X11 License'. See > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses .
Simon, so can we use it, can we, can we, can we ? :-) If that doesn't covey our enthusiasm to get this issue resolved I'm not sure what will :-) Regards, - Nadim __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
