On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Of course, my entire contribution to fribidi thus far has been a single > bug report, and suggesting a development direction for the "new > interface" that nobody seems to like. I am not a copyright holder, and > thus not one who's opinion binds anyone.
I really like your suggestion about doing bidi on UTF-anything, and constantly think about it. I have not yet found a good solution that satisfies all my requirements: * No source/object code duplication. * No significant overhead for UTF-32. * No dirty interface. The main problem is that my beloved language, C, does not have any type of dynamism/overloading... But I would eventually implement it. > Well, technically there is a Linux version of putty compiled using > winelib. That was, however, done mostly to test winelib, and not to > bring putty to Linux. I have even a native PuTTY based on GTK+ installed (that was a matter of "yum install putty"), but I wonder if anybody uses that. --behdad behdad.org _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
