On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 12:56, Owen Dunn wrote:
> I disagree. No matter how preferable UTF8 may be, some people will > have Win1256, and PuTTY understands it _now_ as an encoding for > incoming data. In my view, all Arabic should be shaped and have the > bidi algorithm applied to it, regardless of how it's encoded. > I would have to agree with you there -- but Arabeyes.org will not put any effort to make it easier for CP1256 users ;) > That's a bit wordy. If you look at our current copyright notice we > just give names, and don't credit `minor assistance' (otherwise I'd be > in there!). If Arabeyes.org can live with it, I'd prefer just to list > Ahmad Khalifa in the copyright notice. Of course assistance from > arabeyes.org will be noted in the release announcement of the first > release to support bidi and Arabic shaping! I would prefer something along the lines of: Ahmad Khalifa of the Arabeyes.org project -- unless Ahmad himself finds this objectable. Regards, Mohammed Elzubeir _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
