On ث, 2004-04-13 at 11:31, Ahmad Kamal wrote: > Well, actually I was using qmake, which is IMHO much simpler to maintain > than the autotools nightmare. qmake is also fairly standard, so can we > accept it. I really don't know autotools and have no such free time to > learn the beast. so is qmake allowed?
I also meant other things in the developer guide, at least the CVS headers, to show the author:) and the Licence. Documentation is also welcome. Autotools should be used earlier to be easier, and should not be that difficult for a library. I wouldn't say that this is a priority to embedding miniBidi within PuTTY, whatever that means. Salam, Muhammad Alkarouri _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
