Source from Markus is typically more reliable than any list around. In this case I can confirm that the update is correctly considering newly (Unicode 4.0+) added combining marks.
behdad On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Jacob Nevins wrote: > I'm considering upgrading PuTTY's wcwidth.c to the latest available from > <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/wcwidth.c>, on general principles. > > Examining the changes, I see that the status of some code points has > changed, including ones that I think are in your bailiwick: > > 000005C4-000005C4 0 > -000005C5-0000064A 1 > -0000064B-00000655 0 > -00000656-0000066F 1 > +000005C5-000005FF 1 > +00000600-00000603 0 > +00000604-0000060F 1 > +00000610-00000615 0 > +00000616-0000064A 1 > +0000064B-00000658 0 > +00000659-0000066F 1 > 00000670-00000670 0 > > ("0" = combining/zero-width, "1" = normal single-width; so several > character that were previously spacing characters are now combining.) > > Do you (hence or otherwise) have any opinion on whether the upgrade is a > good idea or a bad idea? Is it likely to break anything (including your > existing Arabic code in PuTTY)? > --behdad http://behdad.org/
_______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
