On 7/26/07, Ahmed Ghoneim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are we depending on GLib? if we're using libc only, we should use
No, libc only. > standard types only, or better yet, for ease of use and portability we > can define our own types. this would help a great deal in maintaining > a single source (less #ifdefs) and accommodate the windows retarded > generic text mapping and TCHAR.H, by simply defining eg. qchar to mean > _TCHAR for windows in just one place That's doable. > i know that this is a preliminary list, but just a small reminder that > we need some utility functions for malloc/free (quran_free, > quran_malloc) for reasons explained in a previous message. We could have a wrapper for this also inside libquran. _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
