RE : Re: RFC libquran: Data packaging

[nabil ben khalifa]

--- Mohammad DAMT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&#1574;&#1602;&#1582;&#1601;&#1579;:

> Pada hari Senin, tanggal 30/07/2007 pukul 15:52
> +0200, nabil ben khalifa
> menulis:
> > --- Mohammad DAMT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> > > How many qiraat available? 2?
> > 
> > 
> > There are 10  accepted qiraat  (qiraat moutawatira
> > &#1602;&#1585;&#1575;&#1569;&#1575;&#1578;
> > &#1605;&#1578;&#1608;&#1575;&#1578;&#1585;&#1577;)
> 
> > and beside these ten, there are many not accepted
> > (chattha
> &#1602;&#1585;&#1575;&#1569;&#1575;&#1578;
> > &#1588;&#1575;&#1584;&#1577;) qiraat.
> 
> Can we just use ENUMs for qiraat? Or we need a
> string?
> 
> quran_text_get_qiraah (QuranText *text, int surah,
> int ayah, 
>    QuranQiraahType *qiraah)
> 
> or
> 
> quran_text_get_qiraah (QuranText *text, int surah,
> int ayah, 
>    const char *qiraah_name)
> 
> 

I think that an index should be better than a string.

To be complete on the matter of qiraat, It should be
known that if we choose to address it we must address
the riwayat problem. In fact, for each qiraa there 2
riwayat which differ in terms of recitation and text.
The most known riwaya is that of Hafs
(&#1581;&#1601;&#1589;) which is a riwaya of the Asim
( &#1593;&#1575;&#1589;&#1605; ) qiraa, the other
riwaya is that of Shuba ( &#1588;&#1593;&#1576;&#1577;
). So, I think the proper term to use here here should
be the riwaya and not the qiraa. 

Nabil




      
_____________________________________________________________________________ 
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail 
_______________________________________________
Developer mailing list
Developer@arabeyes.org
http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer