> > Is that some kind of trademark enforcement? The same way the Mozilla > Foundation does not allow a changed Firefox to be called Firefox? > > Understood this way, I would agree with you. > > In the article of RMS (founder of GNU) he published some articles that are not to be modified, because they were his own ideas you can say RMS said so and so if he did not
We muslims have something more worthy of being taken care of its authenticity it's our free culture our free culture is supposed to be freely copied, redistributed and developed it was even before FSF, I'll give you an extreme example, some scholars did publish a compilations of inauthentic hadiths (sayings of prophet Muhammad) so even inauthentic Hadiths are allowed to be redistributed for example Imam Al-Albani published a book called السلسلة الضعيفة أو صعيف الجامع "The inauthentic series or inauthentic compilation" my idea, Imagine that some one develop his own version of GnuPG that tells you that the signature is valid while it's not so it's not about the title or the trademark it's about the false impression given to the user my case to protect people from being victims of fraud which could be legal because of some license issue _______________________________________________ Developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
