> On Oct 1, 2016, at 2:00 AM, Matthew Ahrens <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> rechecked now full list of changes - we are using sources in all places: 
> cmd/lib/uts
> 
> i’d like propose move shared sources to src/common/lua
> 
> The lua source is used only for ZFS, so how is it "shared"?  Do you have 
> plans for other kernel (or user) subsystems to use lua?

ZFS code is shared between cmd/lib/uts
based on changes in Makefile in different components i can see references to 
LUA sourcs.

for example: in LIBZPOOL:
+OBJECTS=$(LUA_OBJS) $(ZFS_COMMON_OBJS) $(ZFS_SHARED_OBJS) $(KERNEL_OBJS)
+LUA_SRCS=              $(LUA_OBJS:%.o=../../../uts/common/fs/zfs/lua/%.c)

to me : it is mistake. becasue for design of build system shared sources should 
be located at $(SRC)/common - or i have mistake?

in CMD components are the same references to LUA sources.
you try to use the same mistake with ZFS shared sources files - they should be 
moved to shared place instead of use of files from UTS place: by build 
procedure for cmd/zfs cmd/zpool, lib/libzfs* i can see it and it is really hard 
to understand how is ZFS code shared.
and you try to build the same source with different build flags: i know it, 
because i did more gcc warnings cleanups.
much more better to use $(SRC)/common place where you can find shared sources 
between components in different places.

> 
> for private library add -sys and use it for cmd components.
> 
> I don't understand what you're suggesting here.  We aren't creating a lua 
> command or library, it's completely baked in to the zfs kernel module (and 
> for testing only, libzpool).

it was proposal for : if we have shared code between components - move it to 
separate lua-sys library and use it.
becasue it can be usable later for others components.
if you have no shared code/fuctions - no need create library.

> --matt
>  
> 
> i did similar for acpica, but new structure was not approved.
> 
> -Igor
> 
>> i think, based on info that current modified lua is part of kernel modules 
>> builds, will be better put sources to:
>> uts/common/lang/lua/* - where we can save original sources structure for 
>> next updates.
>> 
>> -Igor
>> 
>> > On Sep 30, 2016, at 10:16 PM, Chris Williamson <[email protected] 
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > It was necessary to slightly modify the base lua 5.2.4 interpreter for a 
>> > couple reasons:
>> > 
>> > the need to disable a number of printing, file io, and pcall functions
>> > error handling changes to allow channel programs to return errors rather 
>> > than panicking the kernel
>> > limited kernel stack space
>> > math compatibility functions since we've changed the number representation 
>> > from long double to int64_t
>> > a handful of inconsistencies in expected standard library signatures
>> > From looking at the configuration options for the packaged Lua 
>> > interpreter, unfortunately I don't think we'd be able to just use binaries 
>> > from a userland package. As such we've added the full source.
>> > 
>> > I'm open to suggestions if there's a better home for the interpreter code 
>> > than uts/common/fs/zfs/lua, though.
>> > 
>> > For reference, here's the diff between the stock Lua 5.2.4 interpreter and 
>> > the modified one we've included:
>> > https://gist.github.com/cwill/9b71422008c8c08ff091faefdcc0bc42 
>> > <https://gist.github.com/cwill/9b71422008c8c08ff091faefdcc0bc42> 
>> > <https://gist.github.com/cwill/9b71422008c8c08ff091faefdcc0bc42 
>> > <https://gist.github.com/cwill/9b71422008c8c08ff091faefdcc0bc42>>
>> > —
>> > You are receiving this because you commented.
>> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
>> > <https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/198#issuecomment-250829574 
>> > <https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/198#issuecomment-250829574>>, or 
>> > mute the thread 
>> > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA5Gk15JDTKJVautHBZus9cVgrrS-INSks5qvWAfgaJpZM4KISTa
>> >  
>> > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA5Gk15JDTKJVautHBZus9cVgrrS-INSks5qvWAfgaJpZM4KISTa>>.
>> > 
>> 
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
>> <https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/198#issuecomment-250835912>, or 
>> mute the thread 
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOi0K2ml4gYLpOJ70A764h3tumQTQJpSks5qvWd_gaJpZM4KISTa>.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> openzfs-developer | Archives 
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now>  
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28059325-76ffcbac> | 
> Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription        
> <http://www.listbox.com/>



-------------------------------------------
openzfs-developer
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=28015062-f966d51c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to