skiselkov commented on this pull request.
> + * threads because the trim rate might have changed above.
+ */
+ cv_broadcast(&spa->spa_man_trim_update_cv);
+ mutex_exit(&spa->spa_man_trim_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+ spa_man_trim_taskq_create(spa);
+ spa->spa_man_trim_stop = B_FALSE;
+
+ spa_event_notify(spa, NULL, ESC_ZFS_TRIM_START);
+ spa_config_enter(spa, SCL_CONFIG, FTAG, RW_READER);
+ for (uint64_t i = 0; i < spa->spa_root_vdev->vdev_children; i++) {
+ vdev_t *vd = spa->spa_root_vdev->vdev_child[i];
+ vdev_trim_info_t *vti = kmem_zalloc(sizeof (*vti), KM_SLEEP);
+ vti->vti_vdev = vd;
+ vti->vti_done_cb = (void (*)(void *))spa_vdev_man_trim_done;
Again, I'd like to keep the mechanism generic.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/172#discussion_r116135111
------------------------------------------
openzfs-developer
Archives: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/
Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com
