> Unrelated to the above confusion, do you have an analysis somewhere about why > we're marking specific file systems as requiring to be added to or removed > from the mount in progress tables? It seems like this is probably an > important part of this change. Can we get some comments as to why the set of > file systems in question were noted as being safe to not be included in there.
@rmustacc I'll open a separate PR for these changes. Looking at our internal JIRA, we have a separate issue for this with lots of details, so I think it makes sense to split them apart and land that independent of this feature. I'll work on doing that today. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/536#issuecomment-363885396 ------------------------------------------ openzfs-developer Archives: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/discussions/T22334a01fda83bfd-M37bc00cb7b2edb1552ca3c6f Powered by Topicbox: https://topicbox.com
