Is the zdb problem documented anywhere? The is the first I’ve heard of it.
- Andy. > On 24 Jun 2018, at 18:05, Igor Kozhukhov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Thanks to everyone who helped with analyzes of issues with zdb and crashes > under dilos env with zfs tests. > > zdb was broken on dilos env - no output from commands like 'zdb testpool', > 'zdb -dP testpool' > > I have reverted changeset ' 8809 libzpool should leverage work done in > libfakekernel' and it fixed my problem. > > zdb now works as well as usual. > it is not gcc55 build issue - i have tested with gcc44 builds too - zdb have > no works with example of commands. > i have checked sources - have no found missmerges what can be related to zdb > unstability. > i think, it can be related to some of threads functions (mutex_*) in > libfakekernel with remup. > > I’d like to start thread about: do we really need dependency to libfakekernel > in zfs tools like libzpool, zdb, etc ? > > I think, it will be much more better for portablility try to reduce > dependencies in zfs code base. > > I’d like propose to revert commit with dependency to libfakekernel and to go > to use minimal dependencies for better portablility. > > it will be also helps with ports of changes from others platfrorms too, where > we have same/similar codebases and reduce others unknown breakages. > > my work for it can be found at: > https://bitbucket.org/dilos/dilos-illumos/commits/5a9fb49101f6854d207ec6565788cd9b8b7ac943 > > but i’m not sure i have fixed ztext correctly and need help with it. > > Bets regards, > -Igor > > openzfs / openzfs-developer / see discussions + participants + delivery > options Permalink ------------------------------------------ openzfs: openzfs-developer Permalink: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/Tcb694a62f3cfa33c-M58fd1deba6799ea2495696b2 Delivery options: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups
