Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <[email protected]> Reviewed by: John Kennedy <[email protected]>
Work by Ahmed Gahnem This change introduces a new performance test which does random reads and writes, but instead of using `bssplit` to determine the block size, it uses a fixed blocksize. Additionally, some new IO sizes are added to other tests and timestamp data is recorded with the performance data. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/659 -- Commit Summary -- * 9184 Add ZFS performance test for fixed blocksize random read/write IO -- File Changes -- M usr/src/pkg/manifests/system-test-zfstest.mf (2) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/runfiles/perf-regression.run (3) A usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/fio/random_readwrite_fixed.fio (35) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/random_reads.ksh (8) A usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/random_readwrite_fixed.ksh (82) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/random_writes.ksh (8) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/sequential_reads.ksh (8) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/sequential_reads_arc_cached.ksh (10) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/sequential_reads_arc_cached_clone.ksh (10) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/sequential_reads_dbuf_cached.ksh (4) M usr/src/test/zfs-tests/tests/perf/regression/sequential_writes.ksh (8) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/659.patch https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/659.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/659 ------------------------------------------ openzfs: openzfs-developer Permalink: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T30645d3445359f6e-Ma19784d54e5c947c2d4c3836 Delivery options: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups
