On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:50 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > ZFS's feature set is pretty much enough for my use case, why should I > reinvent those? > It's strange to hear on a file system forum that "you should write your > own file system". :) >
how did you construe my question to mean anything like that? As I said, explain a bit more what you're doing ... > > From ZFS viewpoint the only difference here is that I have as much zpools > as disks. Otherwise it's used as a normal file system. > *openzfs <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/latest>* / openzfs-developer / see > discussions <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer> + participants > <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/members> + delivery options > <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/subscription> Permalink > <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T10533b84f9e1cfc5-M79379c52c02c0b2267f29ced> > -- Michael Schuster http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/ recursion, n: see 'recursion' ------------------------------------------ openzfs: openzfs-developer Permalink: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T10533b84f9e1cfc5-M4c93b46f749c0292cafc7e8f Delivery options: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/subscription
