Hi, I have updated the upstream merge request and posted performance numbers.
https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/12549#issuecomment-968449709 The small benchmarks that I ran show that using sha-ni is 4x faster than using the current x86_64 flavor :-) -Jan On Sun, Nov 14, 2021, at 06:21, Nils Privat wrote: > Since the main PR is not opened against the upstream repo it maybe doesnt get > the full attention - so a quick reply to bring this nice PR up again. > As far as i can see some progress has been made but any feedback and > especially help solving open issues are welcome. > > Much thanks in advance. > > Am Mo., 13. Sept. 2021 um 07:03 Uhr schrieb Jan Kasiak <z...@cybojanek.net>: >> Hi all! >> >> I recently noticed that SHA checksums do not use SHA/AVX/SSSE extensions. >> >> I have a draft of the code here: https://github.com/cybojanek/zfs/pull/1 and >> Rich Ercolani (rincebrain) was gracious enough to give me some feedback. >> >> I submitted a pull request for a portion of it here: >> https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/12549 but have not yet received any >> feedback on it. >> >> Is there anything I should be doing on my side to move this forward? >> >> Does anyone here have some general feedback on my code/commit structure >> etc...? >> >> Thank you, >> -Jan > *openzfs <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/latest>* / openzfs-developer / see > discussions <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer> + participants > <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/members> + delivery options > <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/subscription> Permalink > <https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T1b590d6f875fd4f2-M7ca241248040e731868b9a32> ------------------------------------------ openzfs: openzfs-developer Permalink: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/T1b590d6f875fd4f2-M08d80dd0ff4b1305f2e8d1ff Delivery options: https://openzfs.topicbox.com/groups/developer/subscription
