Perhaps I just overlooked this, but what is the context for *why* this change is needed? Is it just to remove a single large allocation by breaking it up into multiple smaller allocations? I feel like I'm missing the "bigger picture" here.
-- Cheers, Prakash On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:10:10PM +0100, Saso Kiselkov wrote: > On 10/14/13 9:35 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote: > > Are these changes linked with the persistent L2ARC work? Could we first > > integrate the hash table size changes and evaluate persistency separately? > > I've split out the hash-table work here: > http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/skiselkov/new_buf_hash/ > > Cheers, > -- > Saso > _______________________________________________ > developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer _______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
