On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Raphael S Carvalho <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Matthew Ahrens <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Raphael S Carvalho
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Ahrens <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Raphael S Carvalho
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I send the below mail to Brian Behlendorf, but everyone is welcome to
> >> >> help
> >> >> me =)
> >> >> I will write a read-only ZFS driver, and I'm looking for a
> >> >> specification that focus on the on-disk structure of a ZFS partition.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > There's a link to the (outdated) ZFS on disk spec on the OpenZFS
> >> > website:
> >> > http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Developer_resources
> >> >
> >> > What platform will you write your read-only driver for?
> >>
> >> x86
> >
> >
> > I guess I meant what operating system?  What I was trying to get at is:
> why
> > are you writing a read-only ZFS, rather than using one of the existing
> > ports, or porting the existing code?  It's great that you are, I'm just
> > curious what the use case is.
> >
> > --matt
>
> Ah ok, sorry. My platform is Linux, and ZFS on Linux seems to be the
> right place to get started.
> The read-only driver is for Syslinux, by the way, it's a bootloader
> and its VFS layer has some peculiarities.
>
> Yes, I could port existing code, but by writing it myself, I would
> gain experience and learn more about the on-disk structure of ZFS.
>
>
Cool, enjoy it and let us know if you have any specific questions as you
continue development.  If you are inspired to write/update the on-disk
format document (even just from the perspective of what you need to write a
bootloader), that would be appreciated too.  The document that we have is
sorely out of date.

--matt
_______________________________________________
developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Reply via email to