On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:43 PM, "Matthew Ahrens via illumos-zfs" <
> z...@lists.illumos.org> wrote:
>
> 5149 zvols need a way to ignore DKIOCFREE
>
> https://reviews.csiden.org/r/92/
>
>
> Is there a use case where this policy should be per-zvol instead of global?
>


Maybe?  I'm sure you could create a use case where it is.  But I doubt it
would be worth the effort to implement that, especially now that
performance of DKIOCFREE has been much improved (by the fix for 4873).

--matt
_______________________________________________
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Reply via email to