On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:43 PM, "Matthew Ahrens via illumos-zfs" < > z...@lists.illumos.org> wrote: > > 5149 zvols need a way to ignore DKIOCFREE > > https://reviews.csiden.org/r/92/ > > > Is there a use case where this policy should be per-zvol instead of global? > Maybe? I'm sure you could create a use case where it is. But I doubt it would be worth the effort to implement that, especially now that performance of DKIOCFREE has been much improved (by the fix for 4873). --matt
_______________________________________________ developer mailing list developer@open-zfs.org http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer