On 18 November 2014 13:55, Matthew Ahrens <[email protected]> wrote: >> This seems a reasonable structure to me, except that I would make the >> keys precisely the same string (case included) as what would be >> specified in the "-o" arguments, rather than using the value that >> would display in the headings for human readable output. > And rather than using the standard property name (e.g. "referenced")? This > seems less standardized to me, but I guess parroting back the way they > specified it (e.g. "RefeR") should be workable as well.
Sorry, I meant to convey that it should be both spelt the same, and in the same (i.e. lower) case, as it is in the input to the "-o" option. I was reasonably sure that the "-o" option did not accept mixed- or title-case strings and do "the right thing" with them. -- Joshua M. Clulow UNIX Admin/Developer http://blog.sysmgr.org _______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
