----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.csiden.org/r/150/#review438 -----------------------------------------------------------
usr/src/uts/i86pc/vm/htable.c <https://reviews.csiden.org/r/150/#comment370> This all looks good, but I'd like to ask a favor: When I pushed 4110 (panic while reaping htable_cache) upstream, I forgot to add a copyright. It should be: Copyright 2013 Nexenta Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Would you mind adding that to htable.c with your push? Thanks! Gordon - Gordon Ross On Jan. 5, 2015, 11:47 p.m., Matthew Ahrens wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.csiden.org/r/150/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 5, 2015, 11:47 p.m.) > > > Review request for OpenZFS Developer Mailing List and Christopher Siden. > > > Bugs: 5498 > https://www.illumos.org/projects/illumos-gate//issues/5498 > > > Repository: illumos-gate > > > Description > ------- > > Author: Matthew Ahrens <[email protected]> > Date: Tue Dec 30 11:01:02 2014 -0800 > > 5498 kmem_reap does one xcall per page > Reviewed by: Adam Leventhal <[email protected]> > Reviewed by: George Wilson <[email protected]> > Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> > Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <[email protected]> > > We see performance problems due to kmem_reap() of ZFS's zio buf caches. The > kmem_reap() causes a lot of cross-calls to tear down TLB entries, which is > slow. It can also cause latency bubbles in concurrent zfs_read/zfs_write > operations. > > The problem is reliably triggered when a workload switches between accessing > files of different blocksizes. This causes kmem to need to free lots of > buffers of the old size in order to allocate ones of the new size. > > We can improve on this in some cases by using one xcall per slab, to tear > down all the virtually contiguous pages used to back the slab. The > performance benefit will be most noticeable when reaping larger (e.g. 128KB) > caches. > > > Diffs > ----- > > usr/src/uts/i86pc/vm/htable.c 665eb9d41407924de0db2f1781213b7f7a3364e3 > usr/src/uts/i86pc/vm/htable.h c0f5639c60c8c5e4ff9a3c8f8960fb6e877c7bd7 > usr/src/uts/i86pc/vm/hat_i86.c 64e1c2fb46b278bf45070d8fabb06486b7347751 > usr/src/uts/i86pc/vm/hat_i86.h 03317b35e849720f5c0115cc3dc86c5613759f71 > > Diff: https://reviews.csiden.org/r/150/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > ztest > zfs test suite > internal link: http://jenkins/job/zfs-precommit/1466/console > > performance test with the following script: > > ``` > #!/bin/bash -x > > if [[ ! -f /test/big/file ]]; then > zfs create -o recordsize=128k test/big > zfs create -o recordsize=8k test/small > dd if=/dev/zero of=/test/big/file bs=1024k count=200000 > dd if=/dev/zero of=/test/small/file bs=1024k count=200000 > fi > > /home/mahrens/reap.d & > dd if=/test/big/file of=/dev/null bs=1024k > dd if=/test/big/file of=/dev/null bs=1024k > > dd if=/test/small/file of=/dev/null bs=1024k > dd if=/test/small/file of=/dev/null bs=1024k > ``` > > results: 4X performance improvement in kmem_reap of 128K cache. > > Have not tested with __xpv (fully paravirtualized Xen). Can anyone help me > with this testing? I don't have a setup for this. Build artifacts are > available at: > > http://mahrens.org/xcall/packages.tgz > http://mahrens.org/xcall/proto.tgz > > > Thanks, > > Matthew Ahrens > >
_______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
