On 03/07/2015 20:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Currently lzc_receive() requires that its 'snapname' argument is a snapshot > name > (contains '@'). zfs receive allows to specify just a dataset name and would > try > to deduce the snapshot name from the stream. I propose to allow lzc_receive() > to do the same. That is quite easy to achieve, it requires only a small > amount > of logic, it does not require any additional system calls or any additional > data > from the stream.
Forgot to add: the benefit is that the new behavior would allow to keep the snapshot names the same between the sender and receiver at zero cost, without a need to pass the names out of band. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
