> On Sept. 23, 2015, 8:32 p.m., Albert Lee wrote: > > Seems straightforward, would like a clarification if the only net effect is > > that deleted snapshots don't get their deadlisted blocks reclaimed?
That's correct. You can observe this as the zpool's "freeing" property won't decrease. - Matthew ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.csiden.org/r/244/#review784 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Sept. 20, 2015, 5:57 p.m., Matthew Ahrens wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.csiden.org/r/244/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 20, 2015, 5:57 p.m.) > > > Review request for OpenZFS Developer Mailing List and Christopher Siden. > > > Bugs: 6251 > https://www.illumos.org/issues/6251 > > > Repository: illumos-gate > > > Description > ------- > > 6251 add tunable to disable free_bpobj processing > Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <[email protected]> > Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <[email protected]> > > Original author: George Wilson > > > Diffs > ----- > > usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/dsl_scan.c > ba397b1bb0cb9d8558f7685ffb8b2b44e695cb17 > > Diff: https://reviews.csiden.org/r/244/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > ztest, zfs test suite > > http://jenkins.delphix.com/job/zfs-precommit/3021/ > > > Thanks, > > Matthew Ahrens > >
_______________________________________________ developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
