While writing the previous post I made a mistake in copying the excerpt
of my configuration file. 
The actual one I am using is:

<Partitioning>
          <GlobalPartition Address="224.0.0.42"/>
          <NetworkPartitions>
             <NetworkPartition Address="N2 N3 N4 N5" Connected="true"
 Name="part"/>
          </NetworkPartitions>
           <PartitionMappings>
            <PartitionMapping DCPSPartitionTopic="part.*"
NetworkPartition="part"/>
         </PartitionMappings>
</Partitioning>

Sorry for the double post, and thanks again for any help you will
provide.

Regards,
Andrea


On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 11:34 +0100, Andrea Reale wrote:
> Hello everyone.
> 
> I am confused on how the static discovery works related to network
> partitioning. In particular, here is my use case.
> 
> On one node (call it N1), I run a domain participant with one data
> writer which writes some data to a topic 'T' in partition 'part'.
> The reliability QoS for the data writer is best-effort with KEEP_LAST
> history, and history.depth = 1.
> 
> The ospl configuration for that node (N1) for what concerns network
> partitions is as follows:  
> 
> ...
> <Partitioning>
>          <GlobalPartition Address="224.0.0.42"/>
>          <NetworkPartitions>
>             <NetworkPartition Address="N2 N3 N4 N5" Connected="true"
> Name="part"/>
>          </NetworkPartitions>
>          <PartitionMappings>
>             <PartitionMapping DCPSPartitionTopic="part.*"
> NetworkPartition="inputoutput"/>
>          </PartitionMappings>
> </Partitioning>
> ...
> 
> N2, N3, N4, and N5 are the unicast ip addresses of other four potential
> domain participants.
> 
> Now, if no data reader matching the data writer on N1 is started in the
> domain I see no traffic going out from N1 as one would expect. 
> However, if I start exactly one data reader on -- for example -- N2 I
> see that N1 generates UDP traffic towards ALL the hosts in the partition
> (i.e., N2, N3, N4, N5) even though no opensplice instance is running on
> N3, N4 and N5. The destination port of these messages is 53370, the port
> of the best-effort channel.
> 
> Is the behaviour normal? I would have expected that no traffic was
> generated towards the nodes not running opensplice...
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> andrea
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenSplice DDS Developer Mailing List
> Developer@opensplice.org
> Subscribe / Unsubscribe http://dev.opensplice.org/mailman/listinfo/developer


_______________________________________________
OpenSplice DDS Developer Mailing List
Developer@opensplice.org
Subscribe / Unsubscribe http://dev.opensplice.org/mailman/listinfo/developer

Reply via email to