On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Alexander Hilton <[email protected]>wrote:
> Comrades, > > I was considering writing this up on Labourhome but it occurreed to me that > there was nothing in Ms Greenwood's words that indicated she was happy for > them to be publishe, and Tom didn't make clear whether or not this was the > case That is probably moot. They are (except for the exact text) on the Graun Tech Blog. It is a public list. > > > The plug for MySociety aside, the angle most interesting to me was that > this email was to Blears and therefore DSCF would have sacked Greenwood only > if they were notified by Blears' office. DSCF do not have access to Blears' > inbox as far as I know. One of interest to me is that the damage was done not by her email, but by whoever briefed the press. Was that official, or a leak? If a leak, what investigation? If known who, what sanctions? Doing a post for the morning. More on the MS angle is the backwards step in openness after the Watson CoP. People will be scared. M.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
