To be fair, in this case the precision was determined by the Parliamentary Question asked which they did answer directly.
Although, of course, that may have been in response to an ambigious earlier answer. Matt On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:19 AM, paul perrin <[email protected]> wrote: > I think is a huge shame that one needs to note the detail, rather than take > things at their apparent face value - however it has been demonstrated time > and time again that politicians cannot be trusted to give a straight answer > to a straight question, so such analysis is absolutely required. > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
