On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:03:45PM +0100, Francis Davey wrote: > Crowd-sourcing may be the quicker option. ACTA isn't that long > (compared with many other legislative documents) so it may be the > easiest to do.
that's what we're doing now, but the crowd get's exhausted... :( > What are you hoping to end up with? getting transparency. in the new release they removed reference to which alternatives belong to which negotiating countries. as well as seeing what they agreed on in the last negotiations. > The draft of ACTA I have seen has > lots and lots of options (including "and" or "or" in places), so its a > more complicated question than just analysing the difference between > two documents. indeed. but we have managed to consolidate some of the smaller chapters to show exactly this. but doing this for the whole doc after each negotiation round will be hard. until there's no transparency in the acta negotiations we need to reverse-engineer them. -- gpg: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/stef.gpg gpg fp: F617 AC77 6E86 5830 08B8 BB96 E7A4 C6CF A84A 7140 _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
