Although these ideas would be good to implement (especially a distinguishment between written questions, written answers and speeches in alerts) I don't think they'll help your situation much. As I understand it, now that your MP is a minister of state, he will act as a firm supporter of his party and will never be allowed to deviate from party lines. In that way, I doubt he will ever speak as your constituency MP rather than as a minister (although I might be mistaken), and I don't know how easy it would be to distinguish between these two styles of speech. It may be more interesting for you to follow a neighboring constituency's MP of the same party, who often will raise issues that affect the wider area. However, as I said, if I have misunderstood the way parliament works and if you can implement these ideas they would be very useful!

Rustam

On 16/06/2010 11:52, Mark Goodge wrote:
Following the election and change of government, my local MP has been appointed a Minister of State for Defence. One side-effect of this is that my TWFY email alert for him now contains primarily links to his written answers relating to defence procurement. There are two problems with this:

1. I though I was signing up to get an alert when my MP *speaks* in parliament (and, indeed, that's what it says on the "My current email alerts" page - it says the criteria are "spoken by Peter Luff"). Written responses shouldn't be included in that, surely?

2. I'm not all that interested in defence matters - what I want to know about is how well my MP is performing as a constituency MP, and what he says in debates rather than merely giving statements on behalf of his department.

It would be nice, therefore, to have a bit more customisation over what alerts I get. In particular, I'd like to be able to exclude written answers completely from the regular alert so that I really only do get alerted to spoken contributions. Secondly (although less importantly), I'd like the alerts to distinguish between when my MP is speaking on his own behalf and when he's speaking from the dispatch box (ie, when he's speaking on behalf of the government).

Are either of those likely to be implementable in the not-too-distant future?

Mark


_______________________________________________
Mailing list [email protected]
Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Reply via email to