On 14 Jan 2011, at 12:36, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
> The Cabinet Office is a perfectly good place for it. Its core responsibility 
> is the machinery of government and the civil service.  Where it is now is 
> right with the people responsible for admin workflow.

Agreed - but that wasn't the point I was making. My question was how far up the 
agenda it should be (considered objectively).

> This new thing looks like privatization. Oppose. Can always accept later!

this thing *is* a substantive change from something that's quite bad.

What it changes into, is currently open, and one option is something that looks 
like privatisation. 

If you/we want something different, then we need to make a case for that being 
the best option which is far stronger than "looks like privatization. Oppose"





Sam
_______________________________________________
developers-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Unsubscribe: 
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to