> On 8 Dec 2015, at 1:44 AM, Digimer <li...@alteeve.ca> wrote: > > On 07/12/15 05:07 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:29:24AM -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote: >>> On 12/02/2015 05:26 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 3 Dec 2015, at 10:23 AM, Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> For backward compatibility, the (brand new!) notification-agent and >>>>> notification-recipient cluster properties would be kept as deprecated >>>>> shortcuts for a single notify script and recipient. >>>> >>>> Actually, that didn't make it into an upstream release. >>>> So we could just pretend it never happened :) >>>> >>>> Sure its in RHEL but we haven’t advertised it yet and it can be our >>>> problem to do backwards compatibility for - no need to inflict that on >>>> upstream. >>> >>> OK, we'll leave notifications as an undocumented/unsupported technology >>> preview in 1.1.14, with significant interface changes expected in a >>> later version. Users can play with it if they want, but with the >>> understanding that their configs/scripts will need changes to work with >>> future versions. >> >> It is overly optimistic to expect this. We have a problem people >> reading any documentation at all, let alone whether a certain >> thing is technology preview. I'd be wary of adding new features >> in a released version for which interface is going to change.
agreed. thats why i want it removed before release. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dejan > > What about having an 'enable_tech_preview_features="true"' (or > something) option? > > -- > Digimer > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ > What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without > access to education? > > _______________________________________________ > Developers mailing list > Developers@clusterlabs.org > http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
