On 08/16/2016 12:44 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> writes: > >> How does everyone feel about this? Should we host the OCF standards >> under the Linux Foundation, for greater reach and authority, and clear >> neutrality? Or should we bring it under ClusterLabs, to keep everything >> as simple as possible (and perhaps emphasize support for OSes beyond Linux)? > > To me, bringing it in under ClusterLabs sounds more interesting, to be > honest. The community has direct control and it further clarifies that > ClusterLabs is the core development hub for Pacemaker-based HA, plus > it's an opportunity to make the process for proposing changes simple and > clear: Make a pull request at github.com/ClusterLabs/ocf, the discussion > and acceptance/rejection happens there. > > The OCF standard is already stagnated, bringing in more overhead and > process isn't going to improve that situation. From my perspective, it > needs less of that, not more.
I never did hear back from the LF after letting them know the community wanted it under ClusterLabs, so I think we can move forward with that. In my opinion at least, ClusterLabs is now the official home of the OCF standard. _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
