Everyone, I've talked with Oyvind and Dave about the potential for changing the new lvm resource agent's name to something that might be a little more user friendly before we release it upstream.
Currently the name is lvm-activate, which while descriptive, may not be obvious to an end user how it is different/better than the current lvm agent. We've come up with a few ideas although none of them are perfect. Here's some of the options that I've heard: lvm2: Good - It's obvious it's a newer/better version of the lvm agent. Bad - It may be associated with the lvm2 commands which we are working on phasing out. lvmvg or lvmlv or lvm_vg/lvm_lv Good - The agent actually manages vgs/lvs so lvmlv/lvmvg/etc. may be more descriptive Bad - This still may be confusing to users as to why they would use that instead of the normal lvm agent Does anyone else have any other ideas for names or preferences? (Or reasons to keep the current LVM-activate name?). Thanks, Chris
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
