Gentle Reminder!! On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM Rohit Saini <rohitsaini111.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > I know pacemaker booth is being used for geographical redundancy. > Currently I am using pacemaker/corosync for my local two-node redundancy. > As I understand, booth needs atleast 3 nodes to work correctly to do the > automatic failovers. So it does not fit my requirements. > > Few queries are > 1) Can I make use of my current pacemaker/corosync to make it work across > my two geographical nodes for automatic failovers, considering I am ready > to ignore split-brain scenarios. I may need to tweak some timers I believe. > Is this approach possible? > 2) Any disadvantages of going this way? > > > Thanks, > Rohit >
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
