Well, as noted before, I have a concern about this, and from the discussion, it turns out that I now have two concerns.
1) I had gotten the sense from the group that the general opinion was that it should be CC attribution/share alike, with an ability to opt-out. As I've noted before, the ability to opt-out is important. 2) To the extent that we are or will be using the new import module, we will be publishing information that has been created elsewhere. We cannot know for sure that the information created elsewhere can be distributed with a CC attribution/share alike tag. This may be even more important if we end up doing any redistribution. Aldon -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neil Drumm Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 5:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [developers] SourceForge sandbox and code licenses I put a creative commons badge with a attribution/share alike license in the footer. I chose that particular one because I seem to remember it from another thread on one of the lists. If anyone would like a different license tell the list. As for licensing of code, all I have seen around Drupal and modules is the GNU GPL. I think this is a good license to use. Anyone object to that license? -Neil -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] aim: ndrumm3 http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~ndrumm
