Hello Sergei,

Thank you for the reply.
I was trying with 10.2 and compiled with gcc-10.

Let me try with gcc 12.

Thanks.
Best Regards,
Thejaka Amila Kanewala, PhD
https://github.com/thejkane/agm
http://valagamba.net/


On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 2:52 PM Sergei Golubchik <s...@mariadb.org> wrote:

> Hi, Thejaka,
>
> On Aug 03, Thejaka Amila J Kanewala via developers wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to build and run a thread sanitized mysqld binary. In the
> > CMake configuration, I see the WITH_ASAN option, however, I do not see
> > an option to build mysqld with the thread sanitizer.
>
> What MariaDB version did you look at?
> The earliest still supported is 10.4:
>
> This is WITH_ASAN option:
> https://github.com/MariaDB/server/blob/10.4/CMakeLists.txt#L199
>
> This is WITH_TSAN option:
> https://github.com/MariaDB/server/blob/10.4/CMakeLists.txt#L223
>
> > After making some custom configurations, I was able to build a mysqld
> > binary with the thread sanitizer (by linking static thread sanitizer),
> > however, when trying to run it, I got the following error:
> >
> > "ThreadSanitizer: sync allocator overflow (65536*1024). Dying."
> >
> > This error seems to be coming from the tsan library and seems this error
> is
> > caused by too many synchronizations [1]. Reducing the number of threads
> > also didn't help me with this error.
> >
> > So my questions to you experts:
> > 1. Do you run mysqld with the thread sanitizer ?
>
> No, our CI only runs with ASAN, MSAN, and UBSAN.
>
> > 2. If yes, could you please share the details. (e.g., CMake
> > configurations, compiler/linker flags etc.)
> > 3. If not, any suggestions to overcome the above error ?
>
> See above. I've just built with -DWITH_TSAN=ON and didn't get that error
> of yours. On gcc 12.3.1.
>
> I did get a lot of
>
>     warning: 'atomic_thread_fence' is not supported with
> '-fsanitize=thread'
>
> which should've been expected,
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97868
>
> And thread sanitizer was complaining about statistic_increment() macro,
> which, indeed, increments a shared variable without any locks.
> Intentionally, though.
>
> Regards,
> Sergei
> VP of MariaDB Server Engineering
> and secur...@mariadb.org
>
_______________________________________________
developers mailing list -- developers@lists.mariadb.org
To unsubscribe send an email to developers-le...@lists.mariadb.org

Reply via email to