> Actually, I was thinking, this should be
> getAuthentication(String cloudName).
>
> The point is though that the only possible cloud-name is 'mmbase'. What
> are we going to do about this?
>
> Are we actually going to support multiple clouds, are or we going to
> take the opportunitity and get rid of this unimplemented sillyness too?
>
> Btw, I think that if we support multiple clouds, we could as well give
> them separate CloudContext's too. In other words, why should they not have
> different
> URI's in ContextProvider?
>
> Does anybody have ideas about this?
First of all getCloud returns a cloud instance with a specific id
isn't that the way the current transactions work?
Still I can think of a few things we could use cloud for :)
If versioning makes it to the core we will need some way to hide
versions during normal usage. "getCloud("live") getCloud("admin") .
for performance getCloud("readonly") getCloud("noncaching");
but maybe this is all a misuse of an unused feature :)
Multiple cloud is now done via the context providers.
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
