> >So, this thread was initiated because of Node#commit and so on. I suppose > >these can wrap a StorageException in a BridgeException, and this should be > >explicitely noted in the javadoc. > > > > > Or the throws clause should mention the StorageException.
Hmm maybe this is the one case where you can catch an exception and make sure the system will remain in a clean state? _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
