On 8/3/05, Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i tend to agree with you. Quite a lot is being done, and a lot of > functionality is being sorted out and cleaned up, making mmbase a much > more understandable, usable and extensible product. To me mmbase > development dousn't seem so slow. > I think there is a growing sense of what is mmbase (the core) and here > stability, robustness and optimization are more important than new > features. On the other hand there is an influx of projects that deliver > tools/add-ons who are by their nature not so restricted. > Quite a lot has changed in the code and the package structure, much for > the better, even if it dous not bring a lot of new functionality > straight away. Still i thing things like functions (especially in 1.8), > jstl intergration, fieldtypes wizard reconstructions are not to be > sneezed upon. First of all I sorry this thread is in the User list. I agree that in general the development of MMBase is going in right way. I agree that the new features like functions and field types are good. With the way development goes the chances you will run against bug are slimer. The only thing is that it all only gets more complicated while the results remains basicaly the same.
The editwizards are one of the best examples I think of things we already have put to much effort in. _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
