why can support for jndi datasources not just be added. why should the jdbc module be replaced? I think it's a feature we want, but i very much agree with the points michiel makes about dropping simple jdbc support.
Ernst > > START OF CALL: 13 september 2005 20:00 > END OF CALL: 16 september 2005 20:00 > > Remove jdbc module from HEAD > > [_] +1 (YEA) > [X] +0 (ABSTAIN ) > [_] -1 (NAY), because : > [_] VETO, because: > > > Nico > _______________________________________________ > Developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers > _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
