> So, that field is like an alternative password, and about as good, > because if you have it, you only need to offer it as a cookie.... It's as good as it gets. without a chanenge/response system. isn't that possible with a different authentication sheme then basic?
>I think you don't use one of the existing mmbase security implementation > then? was that a question to me? and what problem does that solve? _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
