Let me add that the brokers are connected, but I'm not quite sure the best
way to connect them.
--- Ted
Ted Eiles -- Learning Machines, Inc. - "Essential Learning. Brilliant
Results."
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ted Eiles
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [developers] High Availability, removing SPF
I need to remove my JMS single point of failure (SPF) in my current design.
Scenario:
1000 end-user applications will publish to n topics. Each end-user
application will be given primary and secondary broker addresses (different
machines).
There are four message brokers running on two machines (2 brokers per
machine, each machine is quad-processor).
There are three backend servers that serve different functions. Each server
has a corresponding warm-backup server running in case of failure.
If each backend server creates two durable subscribers on two different
brokers on different host machines for each topic, then have I removed my
JMS SPF? I think I have. Are there errors in my thinking?
Thanks --- Ted
------------------------------------------------------
SwiftMQ developers mailing list * http://www.swiftmq.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send an eMail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the body of your message:
UNSUBSCRIBE developers <your-email-address>
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/developers@mail.iit.de/
------------------------------------------------------
SwiftMQ developers mailing list * http://www.swiftmq.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send an eMail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the body of your message:
UNSUBSCRIBE developers <your-email-address>
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/developers@mail.iit.de/
