Hi!
Just now I have been reading some JMS specs and got this idea:
Whenever you have to ensure a particular order of messages you can use
priority on that message.
So in your case:
- x has the highest priority
- y medium
- z lowest
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Kovi
At 03:54 14.6.01 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Help! We are trying to deploy a federated network of SwiftMQ routers (using
>multicast). Each machine in our network is running a copy of SwiftMQ. Is
>it possible to do the following...
>
>For a given topic, say 'transactions' we have multiple publishers and
>subscribers (on each machine).
>Is it possible (please say yes), to ensure that all subscribers in this
>federated network receive their messages in exactly the same order (whilst
>they are subscribing).
>
>Example: machine 1 publishes x, machine 2 publishes y, machine 3 publishes
>z
>All subscribers receive x, y and z (in that order) on all machines.
>
>Regards,
>Trent
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------
>SwiftMQ developers mailing list * http://www.swiftmq.com
>To unsubscribe from this list, send an eMail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the body of your message:
>UNSUBSCRIBE developers <your-email-address>
>Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/developers@mail.iit.de/
Kako si kaj
------------------------------------------------------
SwiftMQ developers mailing list * http://www.swiftmq.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send an eMail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the body of your message:
UNSUBSCRIBE developers <your-email-address>
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/developers@mail.iit.de/
