> At 12:38 18.6.01 +0200, Michal Jacykiewicz wrote:
>>Distribution 2.1.1-production contains an example configuration with 2
>>SwiftMQ routers, connected as a mini network. The routers have the logical
>>names "router1" and "router2" where "router2" connects to "router1".
>>Both routers have the same configuration.
>>
>>The question is: what is the purpose of such configuration?
>>Is it only to show how to create "mini-network of routers" or are
>>there some other advantages of this?
On Monday, June 18, 2001, Gregor Kovač wrote:
> I think they have pure example meaning, just to show you how to connect two
> routers together and some other stuff. Of course the same applies when you
> have several routers connected together.
But router2 is not acting as a backup for router1?
What happens when router1 fails?
------------------------------------------------------
SwiftMQ developers mailing list * http://www.swiftmq.com
To unsubscribe from this list, send an eMail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and write in the body of your message:
UNSUBSCRIBE developers <your-email-address>
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/developers@mail.iit.de/
